Presidency Blames Governors for Insecurity Amid Debate on State Police

Amid growing concerns over rising insecurity across Nigeria, the Presidency has pointed fingers at state governors, accusing them of mismanaging security funds and failing to adequately support federal security agencies.

Daniel Bwala, the President’s Special Adviser on Policy Communication, stated that several governors allocate as little as ₦20 million monthly to federal security agencies despite receiving security votes ranging between ₦1 billion and ₦3 billion. He questioned why such limited funds were being used to combat widespread violence when more substantial resources are available.

“There are governors who give ₦20m to the SSS, police, and army each month—yet their total security vote is in the billions. Where is the rest going?” Bwala asked.

He emphasized that state governments already have access to federal agencies such as the police, DSS, military, and paramilitary forces. According to him, rather than waiting for the establishment of state police, governors should prioritize smarter use of existing resources.

“A governor receiving billions in security funds can allocate just ₦1bn to purchase surveillance drones, vehicles, and other critical tools. That would dramatically boost efforts against crime,” he added.

Bwala also challenged the popular argument that governors lack the authority to effectively secure their states because they can’t command federal forces.

“It’s a weak excuse. Governors have the legal backing to create and support local vigilance groups and provide the infrastructure needed to support national agencies already operating in their states,” he said.

As discussions around the creation of state police continue, the presidency warned that establishing a new security system would be financially demanding—especially for states already struggling to meet basic obligations like salary payments.

He concluded by calling for a layered, community-based security system that leverages local intelligence and direct engagement rather than waiting for structural reforms that may take years.